Choose one of the options below for discussion. Be sure to put the name of your choice in the subject line of your post. Answer each question in the prompt. Be sure to elaborate and explain. First option Rotten Food (United States v. Parks, p. 161) Based on the law as applied to the facts, should Parks have been charged with a criminal offense when he was not directly running the warehouse where the contaminated food was stored? Should he be convicted when he did not intend to hurt anyone? Discuss why or why not. What precedent does the court rely on in this case? Please remember to include citations for any sources that you use, including the textbook. For the second part of your initial post, do a little exploring online and discuss another white-collar crime story in the news. Include the source, properly cited in APA format. Second option It’s in the Mail (United States v. Cohen, p. 156) Based on the law as applied to the facts, are you convinced that Thriftway was using the mail to perpetuate a fraudulent scheme? What was the underlying scheme, and why was it illegal? Why or why not? What part of the court's opinion supports your conclusion? Who are the stakeholders in this decision? Please remember to include citations for any sources that you use, including the textbook. For the second part of your initial post, do a little exploring online and discuss another white-collar crime story in the news. Include the source, properly cited in APA format.
No comments:
Post a Comment